Return to Polls

Slight Nudity In Gallery Images
August 15, 2009, 2:29PM
Slight Nudity In Gallery Images
 
background: Recently, I was viewing someone's gallery. The girl had various images showing her cleavage, her legs, and sexy poses. Obviously, the pictures attracted negative attention, as well as "hate" comments from various people. Many of the comments consisted of insults and advice for her to "cover up." However, I have seen much worse, where the images were forced to be taken down. Personally, I don't think there is any harm in showing a little cleavage/flesh in pictures. What are your opinions? Discuss.
 
What are your opinions regarding slight nudity in gallery images?
 
Cover up. | percent: 9.6 | votes: 5
 
A little flesh won't hurt anybody. | percent: 48.1 | votes: 25
 
Get naked! | percent: 28.8 | votes: 15
 
Not sure. | percent: 1.9 | votes: 1
 
Other Comment | percent: 9.6 | votes: 5
 
topic: Various



Sielu
August 15, 2009, 6:29PM
I think its stupid that people tell people of what photos they can post of them selfs on the internet

I think if some one wants to put a photo of them naked they should be allowed to and if some one doesnt like fucking X the window or go to a diffrent page because its not like anyone is forcing them to look at their naked photo




Klarth
August 15, 2009, 7:06PM
I voted other.

I think nudity should be completely a-o-kay IF and only if the profile is properly privatised to keep minors from viewing it. Unfortunately, you need Andro for that.

But if we're talking tits or vag or dick, nah, man. There are photo-hosting sites for that. That's shit you can give someone on your own time. DS is not an exhibitionist's workspace (except in the Pool).




Neurotoxic
August 16, 2009, 3:52AM
Was she fat?




JFKFC
August 17, 2009, 12:12AM
who was the chick?
is she worth checking out and perving on?
DS is better than VF.
On VF you have jailbait doing slut poses for 'props'
not that there is anything wrong with looking, but if they are doing that shit, they deserve to be flamed or praised.




nancy
August 20, 2009, 9:47PM
If she was underage I see why they probably did it A lot of people feel the moral obligation to tell a minor to cover up but it's her choice if she wants to flaunt herself like that if they don't want to look at it they can always leave her page.




Fire_Angel
August 23, 2009, 1:30AM
gte nude it dosent hurt anyone




Code
August 24, 2009, 3:12PM
Apart from my eyes.




BarbieBeatdown
August 26, 2009, 8:31PM
Personally If I don't see nipples, cocks, vag, or bare ass, I don't think anything is wrong with it, if you've got it flaunt it. Let
people talk there going to do it whether you like it or not.


------

xxxBrabieBeatdown♥




lemonyfresh
September 2, 2009, 5:12AM
Those little sluts need to put some clothes on




KrystiMarie_
September 3, 2009, 3:32PM
I personally see nothing wrong with it.
If its tasteful.
But looking like your about to pounce a cock is a different story, i dont want to see that,



pages: 1 2 next





Note: Comments containing material which is off topic or which is personally insulting may be deleted without notice.